Loading subject page…
- New Manager Essentials
- How to Manage Team Performance and Feedback
- How to Address Underperformance
Micro-course: How to Manage Team Performance and Feedback
2,928 views
Learn key concepts and earn your certificate.
How to Address Underperformance
00:00
01:32
Video Summary: How to Address Underperformance
When team members consistently miss deadlines and submit incomplete work, addressing employee underperformance becomes a critical leadership skill that separates effective managers from those who let issues fester. Managing underperforming employees requires a systematic approach combining documentation, direct communication, and structured improvement plans to protect team productivity and maintain workplace standards. Watch the full video on JoVE Coach to master this concept with expert-led visuals and step-by-step explanations.
- Document specific performance gaps with objective evidence to build a clear case for intervention
- Conduct direct, private conversations that focus on behaviors and business impact rather than personal judgments
- Structure performance improvement plans with measurable goals, realistic timelines, and appropriate support mechanisms
- Navigate the balance between providing coaching opportunities and maintaining team accountability standards
- Handle escalation processes effectively by partnering with HR when improvement efforts don't yield results
- Set clear expectations for both improvement timelines and consequences if standards aren't met
- Manage team dynamics during performance issues to prevent negative impact on colleagues' morale and productivity
- Build documentation habits that support fair, defensible employment decisions
How Managers Address Underperformance With a Structured Approach
Every manager faces the moment when a team member's performance begins affecting the entire group. You notice missed project milestones, incomplete deliverables reaching clients, or other team members quietly picking up the slack. Without a structured response, these situations escalate quickly, creating resentment among high performers and normalizing substandard work across your team.
Why Most Performance Management Efforts Fail
The majority of managers approach underperformance reactively, either avoiding difficult conversations until problems become severe or jumping straight to punitive measures without proper documentation. This creates legal vulnerabilities, damages trust, and often fails to address root causes. Successful performance management requires a systematic approach that balances support with accountability.
The CLEAR Framework for Performance Intervention
Effective managers follow a structured process: Capture evidence through detailed documentation, Lead direct conversations about expectations and impact, Establish improvement plans with specific milestones, Assess progress through regular check-ins, and Respond with appropriate escalation when necessary. This framework ensures consistency, fairness, and legal compliance while maximizing the chance for employee improvement.
Documentation forms the foundation-track specific incidents, dates, and business impact using objective language. When conducting performance conversations, apply the SBI model: describe the Situation, explain the Behavior observed, and outline the Impact on team goals. This keeps discussions professional and focused on business outcomes rather than personality conflicts.
Designing Effective Performance Improvement Plans
A strong underperformance action plan includes three essential components: specific behavioral changes with measurable outcomes, realistic timelines typically spanning 30-90 days, and clear support mechanisms such as additional training or mentoring resources. Include weekly check-ins to monitor progress and adjust support as needed. Most importantly, outline explicit consequences if improvement doesn't occur, including potential disciplinary action.
Managing Team Dynamics During Performance Issues
High-performing team members quickly notice when colleagues aren't meeting standards. Address this proactively by ensuring workload distribution remains fair, acknowledging extra effort from reliable contributors, and maintaining confidentiality about specific performance interventions. This preserves team morale while you work through the improvement process with the underperforming employee.
Frequently Asked Questions
It means taking systematic action when team members fail to meet established standards, using documentation and structured conversations to either improve performance or make employment decisions. This protects team productivity and maintains workplace accountability standards.
Begin with specific observations about work outputs and business impact rather than personal judgments. Use phrases like "I've noticed several project deadlines were missed this month" instead of "You seem overwhelmed." Focus on behaviors and outcomes, allowing the employee to explain their perspective before discussing solutions.
Include three key elements: specific performance expectations with measurable outcomes, realistic timelines for improvement (typically 30-90 days), and support resources like additional training or mentoring. Document everything and schedule regular check-ins to assess progress and provide feedback.
First, review their workload objectively against other team members' responsibilities to determine if the concern is valid. If workload is reasonable, focus on time management skills, prioritization techniques, and clear deadline expectations. Document both the performance issues and your support efforts.
Start with direct management intervention for minor issues, but involve HR early if you suspect discrimination claims, union involvement, or if the employee has a history of performance problems. HR should always be consulted before any formal disciplinary action or termination discussions.
No, but you need to follow established processes and seek guidance from experienced managers or HR when needed. The structured approach outlined here provides a framework that new managers can apply immediately while building confidence in handling difficult conversations.
It demonstrates to your team that you maintain standards fairly and consistently, which increases respect and trust among high performers. It also develops your skills in difficult conversations, documentation, and decision-making-all crucial competencies for senior leadership roles.
Focus on proactive performance coaching and talent development. Once you can address underperformance confidently, shift toward identifying high-potential team members, providing stretch assignments, and creating development opportunities that prevent performance issues from occurring.
Related Micro-courses
5 Concepts
8 Concepts